NOT VERY STIMULATING

The abiding image of the passage of President Obama’s “stimulus package” is of a senator holding a pile of paper a foot high and admitting he had not read it.

In fact, politicians rarely read the laws they pass, but it is even rarer that they admit it. In this case, however, it would be difficult to deny. There is no way he could have read it – certainly not in the time available.

Congress was so keen to be seen to be doing something that it paid little attention to what it was doing.

As a result, we end up with a huge public spending bill that has little to do with economic stimulus.

There are huge increases in spending on health, education, public works, and the like. Whether these are good or bad in their own right is not a matter for this blog. What is of concern for business is that any economic benefits of injecting cash in this way will be more than cancelled out by increases in taxes and deficits.

Hardly anything in the package is designed to make business more competitive. Some businesses – the sort who give big donations to election campaigns – might get some nice government contracts, but most will get nothing but the bill to pay.

Instead of thinking how cash can be injected into the economy most efficiently and equitably, the politicians have simply used the recession as an excuse to rebrand all their cherished spending projects as “stimulus” and get them through on the dubious pretext that any spending must be good for the economy.

Meanwhile, the real needs of the economy remain unaddressed.

Comments

February 18. 2009 09:40

Stuart Fairney

Very economically put.  This is, if you will forgive a slightly mixed metaphor, wild-hog pork-barrel of the worst kind.  They simply cannot create money out of thin air, as the more sinister of them realise.

Stuart Fairney

Add comment


(Will show your Gravatar icon)

  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading



Disclaimer/Copyright Privacy Integrity Promise





© Agincourt Productions