THE END IS NIGH FOR FACEBOOK

The end is nigh for popular social networking site Facebook ... unless it sharpens up its act.

This may sound an audacious, even lunatic, thing to say given its current all pervasive popularity.

But pause for a moment and remember Friends Reunited. Back in 2005 it too was the darling of the online chattering classes – just like the now almost forgotten lastminute.com from the late nineties. ITV stepped in and paid £120m for Friends Reunited but has now put it up for sale and will be lucky to get £50m back.

Friends Reunited had its day but it couldn’t keep up with the pace of change. The same will happen to Facebook if it doesn’t get its act together, internet users are a fickle bunch and online brand loyalty is wafer thin.

We get new internet fads about every six months. Last summer Facebook was making the splash, now it’s Twitter.

But recently, the only press Facebook has got has been of the unwelcome variety on the back of two arrogant and ham fisted format changes users have been bullied into adopting. And, don’t forget how it was forced to back pedal in response to the furore over privacy rights when it imposed a change in its terms and conditions.

Facebook is suffering growing pains typical of many businesses but because the online world changes so rapidly it needs to move fast otherwise it’ll soon be forgotten.

Perhaps we shouldn’t be too surprised that a company such as Facebook is arrogant. Many (but thankfully far from all) entrepreneurs are arrogant. Often with good reason as they can really be better than those around them.

But when this arrogance invades the way a business deals with its users and customers then its days are numbered. The way Facebook is treating its customers would be crazy at the best of times but in the height of a recession it is abject lunacy. Its demise could be surprisingly quick.

It all started to go wrong when it first imposed a widely unpopular layout change last year. Now there’s another in a ‘me too’ act of desperation as Twitter’s star shines ever brighter in the firmament.

Facebook has failed both to listen and understand its users – as well as grasp basic human psychology. People don’t like change and Facebook should have seen the rebellion coming.

In business, change is often necessary but there are more savvy ways of bringing it about. What Facebook should have done is allowed its users a choice of formats and then provided incentives for them to switch to Facebook’s preferred layout. These incentives could be quite simple – certain new functionality and applications might only work with the new layout. In time people will come round and make a positive decision, which they feel is their own choice, to switch. Instead Facebook just gets itself bucketfuls of bad publicity.

Then, Facebook’s customer service isn’t just dreadful it doesn’t exist! Its excuse for not engaging properly with customers is that it has so many millions of users. But it needs to distinguish between those who use Facebook for free and those who pay for it with advertising and treat them accordingly.

If you take money from people – even if it is just a small amount – then you need to provide a means where they can talk to you. Then you need to listen!

“Next on the charge sheet: Facebook’s kangaroo court. Thousands of people are getting barred from Facebook without ever having done anything wrong. Facebook’s monitoring systems lack the necessary efficiency and they interpret a perfectly innocent action, such as high levels of activity or posting several hyperlinks, as violating one of their myriad of unclear rules and regulations. You get thrown out with no means of redress.

They won’t listen to explanations or bother to verify facts, such is their misguided belief in their flawed system. And to rub salt in the wound, you get an email that patronisingly says: You are barred forever – thank you for your understanding.

In a recession you need every bit of business you can get. For Facebook to be turning away paying customers because it, Facebook, has got its facts wrong and is too arrogant to at least hear what the offended party has to say, is a recipe for bankruptcy.

Customer service is the bedrock of every business – if people get good service they will come back again and again. It is over and above the quality of the product on offer and that is where Facebook has got it wrong.

Finally, it has to look at its social responsibilities. Many people have moved their social interactions online and into Facebook. They have come to rely on it. Barring them is akin to banning them from using a phone and burning their address book. This obviously causes a lot of distress and it won’t be long before Facebook is facing a class action from people who have suffered psychological trauma at its heavy handedness. 

Facebook is a superb product with great potential but unless it grows up and behaves like a mature business its popularity will turn on a sixpence and before they know it they’ll be the next Friends Reunited.

Comments

March 25. 2009 09:05

Sandi

One problem with the entire theory: users do not equal customers. Facebook's real customers are the people who buy ads, and that's exactly who they're catering to with the changes.

Sandi

March 25. 2009 09:28

Internet fads come and go super fast.  Does anyone recall the once billion dollar 'Netscape navigator'?  Does anyone much use 'Friends Reunited' anymore? My own bet says it sells for less than £10M if at all.  

Oh, and Jackie Smith now wants to monitor Facebook in case any terrorists helpfully plan attacks on line.  Can one imagine the twitter "Ahmed is mixing the explosives" or "Abdul is deciding which zionist pigs will be consumed in the fire of Allah"

Oh dear, second rate economics teachers do not good Home Secretarys make. (Twitter: Jackie is claiming perfectly lawful living expenses so just shut up the lot of you)

  

Stuart Fairney

March 26. 2009 00:48

@Sandi - Yes, there is a difference between users and customers. However, two things to note:

i) TV channels' customers are advertisers too, but the TV channels still have to show programs the viewers want to watch. It is viewing numbers that attract advertisers.

ii) Facebook is taking an appalling attitude to advertisers too. We have first hand experience as an (ex) Facebook advertiser. Facebook can't distinguish between the two and treats both like dirt.

Contributor

March 26. 2009 07:56

Vafa Taleban

I have to agree with the author, you do feel a bit like fodder for the advertisers sometimes

Vafa Taleban

Add comment


(Will show your Gravatar icon)

  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading



Disclaimer/Copyright Privacy Integrity Promise





© Agincourt Productions